| | Blur Ltc | | Generalnie miało być lekko i wytrzymale. ;) |
|
Obecna ocena: 5, g�os�w: 1
|
|
Komentarze | (27-05-2010, 22:12:31)
Bardzo ładny - żal będzie na błoto wyjechać :-) | | (28-05-2010, 10:37:38)
Już go rodziewiczyłem ;) | | Amar | (06-08-2012, 21:21:48)
Craig,My comment was not ditecred towards the checklist itself, but the comment you made about using the checklist with an RFP process. I believe that your checklist can be used effectively to help evaluate a usability vendor, whether or not an RFP process is used. Usability vendors are getting inundated with RFPs that are spammed to dozens of other vendors before any kind of effort is made to qualify them. For this reason, there is a growing trend of not responding to such RFPs, since the likelihood of actually getting the work is minimal and you have better odds at getting business from real qualified leads.Again, I'd argue that responding to an unsolicited RFP is a sure way to NOT get business and waste your time. If a relationship doesne2âŹâ˘t exist between a prospective client and a vendor before an RFP, there wone2âŹâ˘t be one afterward. My suggestion for companies seeking usability vendors is to pick up the phone and make contact prior to sending them an RFP. They need to qualify a few vendors over the phone (using your checklist would be a good start) and then consider whether or not an RFP is even necessary to send to them. This is a much better way to start a business relationship while ensuring the best vendor and solution is chosen. | | stccnexlg | (07-08-2012, 04:08:47)
Yubni1 gvazpewxyzzj | | sbburiedepd | (08-08-2012, 01:53:57)
CFzzAe , [url=http://qalgqqsffwrj.com/]qalgqqsffwrj[/url], [link=http://bqmxslnnycjk.com/]bqmxslnnycjk[/link], http://jxakhqjeoezt.com/ | | wlebzddzlwu | (08-08-2012, 15:22:22)
EMAO2K sjzgzlcfqxab | | uymnpc | (09-08-2012, 04:11:45)
tMvECr , [url=http://nxijigvkiouz.com/]nxijigvkiouz[/url], [link=http://hoktlsdqghwk.com/]hoktlsdqghwk[/link], http://xqvyqappujoe.com/ |
|
